search

Which of the following explanations of the effects of United States involvement in the Middle East could Friedmans point of view best be used to support?

1 Jahrs vor
Kommentare: 0
Ansichten: 48

 

<div class="so-col so--d-18"><div id="id14"><div class="so-layout-section"><div class="so-m-b-10"><div class="so-clearfix"><ul class="so-tiers so-f-l so--1"><li>Record<span class="so-sr">: found</span></li><li>Abstract<span class="so-sr">: found</span></li><li>Article<span class="so-sr">: found</span></li></ul><span class="so-tiers-open-access so-icon so--open-access"><span class="so-sr">Is Open Access</span></span></div></div><h2 class="so-article-header-title" dir="auto" itemprop="name">Promoting democracy or pursuing hegemony? An analysis of U.S. involvement in the Middle East</h2><div class="so-b3-container so--5 so-m-b-5"><div class="so-b3-label so--tiny-font so--borderless so--gray-1">research-article</div></div><div class="so-article-image so-user-image-wrapper so--3-cols"><img class="so-user-image" src="https://www.scienceopen.com/document_file/53430e55-10f5-4233-9007-77acf8496b91/ScienceOpen/large.png" alt="" itemprop="image"></div><div><div class="so-d so-article-header-text"> <div class="so-article-header-info"> <span class="so-metadata-label"> Author(s): </span> <a id="d51605e28" class="named-anchor"> </a> <a target="_blank" xmlns:fn="http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions" href="https://www.scienceopen.com/search#author/e3b25f12-7d00-4fc6-9291-dbb083240a81"> <span itemprop="author">Ruairidh Wood</span> </a> </div> <div class="so-article-header-info"> <span class="so-metadata-label">Publication date <span class="data"> (Print): </span> </span> <span itemprop="datePublished">1 December 2019 </span> </div> <div class="so-article-header-info"> <span class="so-metadata-label">Journal: </span> <a target="_blank" itemprop="journal-url" href="https://www.scienceopen.com/collection/ed8577c4-e9f1-4b39-9bd3-803d0eba883d">Journal of Global Faultlines</a> </div> <div class="so-article-header-info"> <span class="so-metadata-label">Publisher: </span> <a target="_blank" itemprop="publisher-url" href="https://www.scienceopen.com/collection/2281cdf2-c34b-4e11-895b-0f0152b8783e">Pluto Journals</a> </div> </div></div><div class="so-m-y-15"><div class="so-b3-container so--5 so--bottom"><button class="so-b3 so-dropdown" id="id15"> Download <span class="so-icon so--dropdown">&nbsp;</span></button><div class="so-n"><ul class="so-dropdown-inner so--right" id="id16"><li><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" download="" href="https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?-1.ILinkListener-header-action~bar-download~dropdown-pdf~link-link&doi=10.13169/jglobfaul.6.2.0166" class="so-dropdown-list-button"> Download <span>PDF</span></a></li><li></li><li><a target="_blank" class="so-dropdown-list-button" href="https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?-1.ILinkListener-header-action~bar-download~dropdown-xml~link&doi=10.13169/jglobfaul.6.2.0166" rel="nofollow" onclick="ga('send', 'event', 'Article Events', 'XML Downloaded', 'Promoting democracy or pursuing hegemony? An analysis of U.S. involvement in the Middle East', 1, {'dimension4': 'Pluto Journals', 'dimension5': 'Journal of Global Faultlines'});">XML</a></li></ul></div><script type="text/javascript"> /*<![CDATA[*/ so_init('dropdown', { 'buttonID': "id15", 'dropdownID': "id16" }); /*]]>*/

Show

  • Review article
  • Invite someone to review

Bookmark

Promoting democracy in the Middle East has been cited by the U.S. as a key foreign policy objective post-Cold War. As a result the U.S. has intervened in numerous countries and conflicts, particularly since 9/11 and the subsequent declaration of the War on Terror. However, this has not been without controversy and its actions often aid imperialism rather than the country it claims its intervention is benefitting. This paper challenges the claim that the U.S. is indeed promoting democracy, arguing that it is instead pursuing national objectives to increase hegemony. By analyzing U.S. involvement in the Middle East from the Soviet-Afghan War, through the Invasion of Iraq and Arab Spring, up to present day, this paper contends that the U.S. has continuously created instability in the region, in terms of both state and human security. By constructing various actors as threats to themselves, the West or the world, the U.S. has been able to justify its aggressive pursuit of foreign policy objectives in the Middle East. Utilizing the theories of realism, liberalism, and constructivism, this research discusses how the U.S. has attempted to achieve hegemony in the region, and indeed globally, before contrasting this with humanitarian efforts it has been a part of. The paper also analyses the impact external actors have had on U.S. action, discussing the crucial but often constrained role of the United Nations, as well as the contentious proliferation of private military and security companies in the post-Cold War era.

Contributors Journal

Journal ID (doi): 10.2307/j50018794

Journal ID (jcode): jglobfaul

Title: Journal of Global Faultlines

Publisher: Pluto Journals

ISSN: 2397-7825

ISSN: 2054-2089

Publication date (Print): 1 December 2019

Volume: 6

Issue: 2 ( doiID: 10.13169/jglobfaul.6.issue-2 )

Pages: 166-185

Affiliations

Ruairidh Wood is a Birmingham City University Graduate with a degree in Security Studies.

Article

Publisher ID: jglobfaul.6.2.0166

DOI: 10.13169/jglobfaul.6.2.0166

SO-VID: 6e938284-92da-4a42-8f1d-082ecf940159

Copyright statement: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

License:

All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Custom metadata


  1. Akcinaroglu, S. & Radziszewski, E. (2013) “Private Military Companies, Opportunities, and Termination of Civil Wars in Africa,” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 57(5): 795–821. Available at: www.jstor.org/stable/24545571 (accessed 7 March 2019).

  2. Aliyev, H. (2011) “Neo-Realism and Humanitarian Action: From Cold War to Our Days,” The Journal of Humanitarian Assistance. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1862005 (accessed 6 March 2019).

  3. Amnesty International (2016) “The ‘Arab Spring’: Five Years On.” Available at: www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2016/01/arab-spring-five-years-on/ (accessed 1 February 2020).

  4. Atlas, P. (2012) “U.S. Foreign Policy and the Arab Spring: Balancing Values and Interests,” Digest of Middle East Studies 21(2): 353–385. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1949-3606.2012.00158.x (accessed 7 March 2019).

  5. Bagdonas, A. (2012) “Russia's Interests in the Syrian Conflict: Power, Prestige, and Profit,” European Journal of Economic and Political Studies, EJEPS 5(2) 55–77. Available at: www.academia.edu/3507862/Russia_s_Interests_in_the_Syrian_Conflict_Power_Prestige_and_Profit (accessed 1 February 2020).

  6. Barkin, J.S. (2003) “Realist Constructivism,” International Studies Review 5 (3): 325–342. Available at: www.jstor.org/stable/3186573?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents (accessed 1 February 2020).

  7. Barnett, M.N. (1997) “Bringing in the New World Order: Liberalism, Legitimacy, and the United Nations,” World Politics 49(4): 526–551. Available at: www.jstor.org/stable/25054018?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents (accessed 1 February 2020).

  8. Barnett, M.N. (1998) Dialogues in Arab Politics: Negotiations in Regional Order. New York: Columbia University Press

  9. Basaran, H.R. (2014) “Identifying the Responsibility to Protect,” The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs 38(1): 195–212. Available at: https://ffmessaround.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/38-1_basaran1.pdf (accessed 1 February 2020).

  10. Bauman, Z. (2001) “Wars of the Globalization Era,” European Journal of Social Theory 4(1): 11–28. Available at: www.scribd.com/document/57495902/Bauman-Wars-of-the-Globalization-Era (accessed 1 February 2020).

  11. Baylis, J., Smith, S., & Owens, P. (2017) The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  12. BBC (2008) “Blackwater incident: What happened.” Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/7033332.stm (accessed 7 March 2019).

  13. BBC (2018) “Trump's Campaign Promises: Has He Delivered on Them?” Available at: www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-37982000 (accessed 1 February 2020).

  14. Beehner, L. (2006) “Israel's Nuclear Program and Middle East Peace,” Council on Foreign Relations. Available at: www.cfr.org/backgrounder/israels-nuclear-program-and-middle-east-peace (accessed 1 February 2020).

  15. Blanton, T. (2004) “The President's Daily Brief,” The National Security Archive. Available at: https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu//NSAEBB/NSAEBB116/index.htm (accessed 6 March 2019).

  16. Boyce, J. (2013) “Surrendering Sovereignty: The Private Military Industry, the State, and the Ideology of Outsourcing,” Masters thesis. University of Iceland.

  17. Brody, R. (2005) “Getting Away with Torture? Command Responsibility for the U.S. Abuse of Detainee,” Human Rights Watch 17(1): 1–95. Available at: www.hrw.org/reports/2005/us0405/us0405.pdf (accessed 1 February 2020).

  18. Bulajic, A. & Domazet, D. (2012) “Globalization and Outsourcing and Off Shoring,” Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences 3(9): 1321–1328. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/baf2/e0bda86f43d3148ecedc6c3566d4214f9b8a.pdf (accessed 1 February 2020).

  19. Buzan, B. (1983) People, States & Fear: The National Security Problem in International Relations. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

  20. Chediac, J. (1992) “The Massacre of Withdrawing Soldiers on ‘The Highway of Death’ in War Crimes: A Report on United States War Crimes Against Iraq to the Commission of Inquiry for the International War Crimes Tribunal.” Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20130307060518/http://deoxy.org/wc/wc-death.htm (accessed 1 February 2020).

  21. Cohen, R. (2013) “A Dangerous Interregnum,” New York Times. Available at: www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/opinion/cohen-a-dangerous-interregnum.html (accessed 1 February 2020).

  22. Dannreuther, R. (2013) International Security: The Contemporary Agenda. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  23. Didam Audu, S. (2013) “The War on Terror and the Afghan Stalemate.” Available at: https://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/IAGS/article/view/8828/8884 (accessed 6 March 2019).

  24. Dekhakhena, A. (2013) “How 9/11 Triggered the Arab Spring.” Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2293858 (accessed 6 March 2019).

  25. Doukakis, J.A. (2018) “The Responsibility to Protect through the Realist Lens: Strategic Choice, Inconsistency, and Delegitimation,” The Yale Review of International Studies. Available at: http://yris.yira.org/essays/2383 (accessed 1 February 2020).

  26. Doyle, M.W. (2011) Liberal Peace. London: Routledge.

  27. Erickson, M. (2013) “The United States and the Case for Humanitarian Intervention,” Law School Student Scholarship. Available at: https://scholarship.shu.edu/student_scholarship/339 (accessed 7 March 2019).

  28. Fox News (2008) “Blackwater Brand Shift: Security to Take Back Seat.” Available at: www.foxnews.com/printer_friendly_wires/2008Jul22/0,4675,BlackwaterInvestigation,00.html (accessed 7 March 2019).

  29. Francioni, F. (2008) “Private Military Contractors and International Law: An Introduction,” European Journal of International Law, 19(5): 961–964. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/ejil/article/19/5/961/505599 (accessed 1 February 2020).

  30. Frank, A.G. (1970) Latin America: Underdevelopment or Revolution. New York: Monthly Review Press.

  31. Friedman, A. (1993) Spider's Web: The Secret History of How the White House Illegally Armed Iraq. New York: Bantam Books.

  32. Fritz, P. (2015) “Imposing Democracy to Ensure the Peace: The Role of Coercive Socialization, Foreign Policy Analysis 11(4): 377–396. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/fpa/article/11/4/377/1797767 (accessed 1 February 2020).

  33. Fukuyama, F. (2018) “Against Identity Politics: The New Tribalism and the Crisis of Democracy,” Foreign Affairs. Available at: www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/americas/2018-08-14/against-identity-politics-tribalism-francis-fukuyama (accessed 1 February 2020).

  34. Galbraith, P.W. (2006) The End of Iraq: How American Incompetence Created a War Without End. New York: Simon & Schuster.

  35. Gaspar, P. (2001) Afghanistan, the CIA, bin Laden and the Taliban. International Socialist Review. Available at: www.isreview.org/issues/20/CIA_binladen_afghan.shtml (accessed 6 March 2019).

  36. Glaser, C.L. (2016) “Realism,” in Collins, A. (Ed.) Contemporary Security Studies, Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 13–29

  37. Graham, T. (2019) “U.S.–Russian Relations in a New Era,” The National Interest. Available at: https://nationalinterest.org/feature/us-russian-relations-new-era-40637 (accessed 1 February 2020).

  38. Greiner, B. (2010) War Without Fronts: The USA in Vietnam. London: Vintage.

  39. Hamourtziadou, L., Dardagan, H., & Sloboda, J. (2018) “Generation: War.” Available at: www.iraqbodycount.org/analysis/beyond/generation-war/ (accessed 30 Jan. 2020).

  40. Hinnebusch, R. (2007) “The Invasion of Iraq: Explanations and Implications,” Critique: Critical Middle Eastern Studies 16 (3): 209–228 Available at: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10669920701616443 (accessed 1 February 2020).

  41. Institute for Economics & Peace (2012) “Capturing the Impact of Terrorism from 2002– 2011,” Global Terrorism Index. Available at: https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/2012-Global-Terrorism-Index-Report.pdf (accessed 6 March 2019).

  42. Isenberg, D. (2006) “The Good, The Bad and the Unknown: PMCs in Iraq. 'Guns 'n gates: The role of private security actors in armed violence,' “ Cost Action 25 Working Group 3. Available at: www.academia.edu/8851883/The_Good_the_Bad_and_the_Unknown_PMCs_in_Iraq (accessed 1 February 2020).

  43. Kamm, F.M. (2004) “Failures of Just War Theory: Terror, Harm, and Justice,” Ethics 114(4): 650–692 Available at: www.law.upenn.edu/institutes/cerl/conferences/targetedkilling/papers/KammFailuresofJustWarTheory.pdf (accessed 1 February 2020).

  44. Kepel, G. (2006) Jihad: The Trail of Political Islam. 4th ed. London: I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd.

  45. Krauthammer, C. (1991) “The Unipolar Moment,” Foreign Affairs, 7(1): 23–33. Available at: http://users.metu.edu.tr/utuba/Krauthammer.pdf (accessed 1 February 2020).

  46. Levin, N. (1994) Prisms & Policy: U.S. Security Strategy After the Cold War. RAND Corporation. Available at: www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR365.html (accessed 7 March 2019).

  47. Lin, S.G. (2007) “U.S. Lying about Halabja: Justifying the Invasion of Iraq,” Economic and Political Weekly, 42(36): 3625–3632. Available at: www.jstor.org/stable/40276361?read-now=1&refreqid=excelsior%3Ab80f5701e858292a67add54ec8615fd3&seq=6#page_scan_tab_contents (accessed 1 February 2020).

  48. Lord Ashcroft (2016) “How the United Kingdom voted on Thursday… and why.” Available at: http://lordashcroftpolls.com/2016/06/how-the-united-kingdom-voted-and-why/ (accessed 1 February 2020).

  49. McIntyre, J. (2001) “Tenth Anniversary of the Gulf War: A Look Back.” Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20081211060829/http://archives.cnn.com/2001/U.S./01/16/gulf.anniversary/index.html (accessed 1 February 2020).

  50. Military Times (2018) “Mattis Is Out, and Blackwater Is Back: ‘We Are Coming.‘” Available at: www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2018/12/21/mattis-is-out-and-blackwater-is-back-we-are-coming/ (accessed 7 March 2019).

  51. Momani, B. (2012) “Russia and China Provide Cover for Assad's Syria,” Brookings Available at: www.brookings.edu/opinions/russia-and-china-provide-cover-for-assads-syria/ (accessed 1 February 2020).

  52. Morgan, P. (2016) “Liberalism and Liberal Internationalism,” in Collins, A. (Ed.) Contemporary Security Studies, Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 30–46

  53. Newman, F.C. (1983) “Non-Military Intervention by International and Regional Organizations in Internal Conflicts.” Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1870&context=gjicl (accessed 1 February 2020).

  54. New York Times (2002) “Text: Bush's Speech to U.N. on Iraq.” Available at: www.nytimes.com/2002/09/12/politics/text-bushs-speech-to-un-on-iraq.html (accessed 1 February 2020).

  55. Nye, J.S. (1992) “What New World Order?” Foreign Affairs 71(2): 83–96. Available at: www.jstor.org/stable/20045126?readnow=1&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents (accessed 1 February 2020).

  56. Oneal, J.R. (2000) “Causes of Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885–1992.” Presented at the workshop on “Globalization and Armed Conflict” of the European Consortium on Political Research, Copenhagen, April 15–19, 2000. Available at: https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/07420483-6f84-4d7d-8104-22379150f7c9.pdf (accessed 1 February 2020).

  57. Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (2018) “OPEC Share of World Crude Oil Reserves.” Available at: www.opec.org/opec_web/en/data_graphs/330.htm (accessed 6 March 2019).

  58. Paul, D. (2014) “The Use of Private Security Companies in the Humanitarian Sector,” PhD thesis. Coventry University.

  59. Pingeot, L. (2012) “Dangerous Partnership: Private Military & Security Companies and the UN.” New York: Global Policy Forum. Available at: www.globalpolicy.org/images/pdfs/GPF_Dangerous_Partnership_Full_report.pdf (accessed 1 February 2020).

  60. Robson, T. (2002) “Bosnia: The United Nations, Human Trafficking and Prostitution,” World Socialist. Available at: www.wsws.org/en/articles/2002/08/bosn-a21.html (accessed 1 February 2020).

  61. Rodgers, J. (2019) “Russia and Syria: Policies, Problems, Perspectives,” Forbes. Available at: www.forbes.com/sites/jamesrodgerseurope/2019/01/11/russia-and-syria-prospects-and-prizes/#5f2b76ae6852 (accessed 1 February 2020).

  62. Ruhle, M. (2015) “Deterrence: What it Can (and Cannot) Do,” NATO Review. Available at: www.nato.int/docu/review/2015/Also-in-2015/deterrence-russia-military/EN/index.htm (accessed 1 February 2020).

  63. Russet, B. (2013) “Liberalism,” in T. Dunne, M. Kurki & S. Smith (Eds) International Relations Theories, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 94–110.

  64. Seay, M. (2007) “Realism, Liberalism and Humanitarian Intervention: Is there a Middle Ground?” Masters thesis. London School of Economics and Political Science.

  65. Singer, P.W. (2004) “The Contract the Military Needs to Break,” Brookings. Available at: www.brookings.edu/opinions/the-contract-the-military-needs-to-break/ (accessed 1 February 2020).

  66. Spalding, L. (2013) “A Critical Investigation of the IR Theories that Underpin the Debate on Humanitarian Intervention,” International Public Policy Review, 7(2). Available at: www.ucl.ac.uk/ippr/journal/downloads/vol7no2/irtheory (accessed 7 March 2019).

  67. Stokes, D. (2018) “Trump, American Hegemony and the Future of the Liberal International Order,” International Affairs 94(1): 133–150. Available at: www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/images/ia/INTA94_1_8_238_Stokes.pdf (accessed 1 February 2020).

  68. Tesón, F. (2005) Humanitarian Intervention: An Inquiry Into Law and Morality. 3rd ed. New York: Transnational Publishers.

  69. The 9/11 Commission Report (2004) “National Commission on Terrorists Attacks Upon the United States.” Available at: www.9-11commission.gov/report/ (accessed 6 March 2019).

  70. The Oil Factor (2005) (video) Directed by G. Ungerman and A. Brohy. Free-Will Productions.

  71. Tung, L. (2013) “What Were North Vietnamese Tactics?” Available at: https://thevietnamwar.info/north-vietnamese-tactics/ (accessed 1 February 2020).

  72. UNHCR (2019) “Syria Emergency.” Available at: www.unhcr.org/syria-emergency.html (accessed 1 February 2020).

  73. U.S. GAO (2005) “Rebuilding Iraq: Actions Needed to Improve Use of Private Security Providers,” United States Government Accountability Office. Available at: www.gao.gov/new.items/d05737.pdf (accessed 1 February 2020).

  74. U.S. Senate (2004) “Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Related Agencies Appropriation Bill, 2005,” Report 108-344. Available at: www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CRPT-108srpt344/pdf/CRPT-108srpt344.pdf (accessed 1 February 2020).

  75. Wendt, A. (1992) “Anarchy Is What States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics,” International Organization 46(2): 391–425. Available at: www.jstor.org/stable/2706858?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents (accessed 1 February 2020).

  76. Williams, B. (2011) “On the Trail of the ‘Lions of Islam’: Foreign Fighters in Afghanistan and Pakistan, 1980–2010,” Orbis, 55(2): 216–239. Available at: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030438711000056 (accessed 6 March 2019).

  77. Wood, C. (2013) “Private Military Companies and International Security,” E-International Relations Students. Available at: www.e-ir.info/2013/03/21/private-military-companies-and-international-security/ (accessed 1 February 2020).

  78. Yacubian, M. (2018) “U.S. Policy Toward Syria: Part I,” United States Institute of Peace. Available at: www.usip.org/publications/2018/09/us-policy-toward-syria-part-i (accessed 6 March 2019).

  79. Ziabari, K. (2011) “The United Nations Security Council: An Organization for Injustice,” Global Research. Available at: www.globalresearch.ca/the-united-nations-security-council-an-organization-for-injustice/22875 (accessed 7 March 2019).

Comment on this article

Which of the following best explains the effect of Ronald Reagans election to the presidency on United States foreign policy?

Which of the following best explains the effect of Ronald Reagan's election to the presidency on United States foreign policy? A) He asserted more direct diplomatic and military pressure on the Soviet Union than did his predecessors.

Which of the following best describes a similarity between Wilentz's and the Edsalls's arguments about political change in the 1980s ?'?

Which of the following best describes a similarity between Wilentz's and the Edsalls's arguments about political change in the 1980s? C) Both interpretations suggest tax policies as a factor contributing to conservative victories.

Which of the following best describes a difference between the purpose of the institution established in source 1 and the purpose of the institutions established in source 2?

The institution established in Source 1 was intended to prevent war, while the institutions established in Source 2 were intended to promote economic development and international trade.

Which of the following best explains how the Red Scare following the Second World War reflected the larger historical context?

Which of the following best explains how the Red Scare following the Second World War reflected the larger historical context? The ideas reveal strategies by the United States to gain support of other nations against Soviet expansion.

Which of the following postwar developments most directly contributed to the ideas in the excerpt?

1) Which of the following postwar developments most directly contributed to the ideas in the excerpt? The foreign policy strategy of supporting developing nations as a means to prevent the spread of communism.

explanations effects united states involvement middle east friedmans point view support

zusammenhängende Posts

Which of the following is not among the explanations for income equality given in the textbook?
Which of the following is not among the explanations for income equality given in the textbook?

What are some of the possible explanations sociologists have given for the decline in crime?
What are some of the possible explanations sociologists have given for the decline in crime?

Which of the following explanations provides a strong support of the role of active listening in the classroom quizlet?
Which of the following explanations provides a strong support of the role of active listening in the classroom quizlet?

In which of the following ways do institutional explanations of political violence differ from ideational explanations?
In which of the following ways do institutional explanations of political violence differ from ideational explanations?

Werbung

NEUESTEN NACHRICHTEN

Which of the following are website design features that not annoy customers?
1 Jahrs vor . durch UnyieldingHurricane
Hyperefficient chips of the future may also be made out of carbon nanotubes.
1 Jahrs vor . durch AdvancedAbsurdity
Ab in den Urlaub Login funktioniert nicht
1 Jahrs vor . durch UngratefulCabal
Sibylle berg ein paar leute suchen das glück und lachen sich tot
1 Jahrs vor . durch BloodshotScenery
Nicht schon wieder an die Ostsee text
1 Jahrs vor . durch LunaticAdultery
Indirect methods for determining which evaluative criteria are being used include
1 Jahrs vor . durch OverstuffedMailing
What are 4 most important factors influencing consumer purchasing decisions?
1 Jahrs vor . durch GalvanizedGrappling
When evaluating research material the three primary evaluation criteria are?
1 Jahrs vor . durch Down-to-earthRedemption
Was geht durch eine Tür aber geht niemals rein und kommt niemals raus Lösung
1 Jahrs vor . durch RepulsivePullman
E-bike mit bosch motor 85 nm
1 Jahrs vor . durch UntrainedTuesday

Werbung

Populer

Werbung

Um

Legal

Hilfe

Sozial

homeentrdeptjp
Urheberrechte © © 2024 membukakan Inc.