In an organizational structure, “chain of command” refers to a company's hierarchy of reporting relationships – from the bottom to the top of an organization, who must answer to whom. The chain of command not only establishes accountability, it lays out a company’s lines of authority and decision-making power. A proper chain of command ensures that every task, job position and department has one person assuming responsibility for performance. Show
Command Chain FormationThe command chain doesn't happen accidentally. Organizational designers lay it out as the last step in creating an organizational structure. Planners first consider a company’s goals since organizational structure must support strategy. Designers next determine the tasks needed to reach the goals. Departmentalization follows as designers decide how to group the tasks. Grouping affects resource sharing and the ease with which people communicate and coordinate work. After departmentalizing, designers assign authority for tasks and areas. Once authority is assigned, planners can finally lay out the relationships between positions, thereby creating a chain of command. Reporting Relationships and Organizational ChartThe reporting relationships established in the final step of organizational design are easy to see on an organizational chart, which depicts a company’s structure. Starting at the bottom, each position is connected to one above it by a line. Following the line vertically from position to position reveals the chain of command. Each person is one link in the chain. Span of ControlA manager may be linked to many or few subordinates. The number of people reporting to a manager is called a manager’s span of control. Managers with wide spans of control have many subordinates, and it’s not possible for a manager to closely examine activity. Consequently, employees under such managers have more authority to perform their jobs and even make decisions than do employees reporting to managers with narrow spans of control. Flat Organizational StructuresWhen a manager has a wide span of control, the organizational chart takes on a horizontal, flattened appearance. Fewer managers are needed in middle management, so the company has less of a power hierarchy. These are characteristics found in organic organizational structures. In organic structures, the chain of command’s importance is de-emphasized, since power is distributed among employees. The chain may only consist of employees and the owner or employees to a manager to the CEO, making for a very short chain of command. Lacking bureaucracy, flat organizations can readily mobilize to meet market conditions. Vertical Organizational StructuresManagers closely supervising subordinates can only manage a few. These managers have narrow spans of control. Narrow spans require more managers to make sure all employees are properly supervised. These managers must also be managed closely, given their involvement in details and decision-making. This results in tall organizations with several layers of middle management. The chain of command is important and is used to exert control from the top. Many rules govern activities. Such structures are rigid and mechanistic, leaving little room for innovation and creativity. Work specialization One popular organizational concept is based on the fundamental principle that employees can work more efficiently if they're allowed to specialize. Work specialization, sometimes called division of labor, is the degree to which organizational tasks are divided into separate jobs. Employees within each department perform only the tasks related to their specialized function. When specialization is extensive, employees specialize in a single task, such as running a particular machine in a factory assembly line. Jobs tend to be small, but workers can perform them efficiently. By contrast, if a single factory employee built an entire automobile or performed a large number of unrelated jobs in a bottling plant, the results would be inefficient. Despite the apparent advantages of specialization, many organizations are moving away from this principle. With too much specialization, employees are isolated and perform only small, narrow, boring tasks. In addition, if that person leaves the company, his specialized knowledge may disappear as well. Many companies are enlarging jobs to provide greater challenges and creating teams so that employees can rotate among several jobs. Chain of command The chain of command is an unbroken line of authority that links all persons in an organization and defines who reports to whom. This chain has two underlying principles: unity of command and scalar principle.
Sometimes, however, an organization deliberately breaks the chain of command, such as when a project team is created to work on a special project. In such cases, team members report to their immediate supervisor and also to a team project leader. Another example is when a sales representative reports to both an immediate district supervisor and a marketing specialist, who is coordinating the introduction of a new product, in the home office. Nevertheless, these examples are exceptions to the rule. They happen under special circumstances and usually only within a special type of employee group. For the most part, however, when allocating tasks to individuals or grouping assignments, management should ensure that each has one boss, and only one boss, to whom he or she directly reports.
Authority is the formal and legitimate right of a manager to make decisions, issue orders, and allocate resources to achieve organizationally desired outcomes. A manager's authority is defined in his or her job description. Organizational authority has three important underlying principles:
In addition, authority comes in three types:
Why would an organization create positions of functional authority? After all, this authority breaks the unity of command principle by having individuals report to two bosses. The answer is that functional authority allows specialization of skills and improved coordination. This concept was originally suggested by Frederick Taylor. He separated “planning” from “doing” by establishing a special department to relieve the laborer and the foreman from the work of planning. The role of the foreman became one of making sure that planned operations were carried out. The major problem of functional authority is overlapping relationships, which can be resolved by clearly designating to individuals which activities their immediate bosses have authority over and which activities are under the direction of someone else. Delegation A concept related to authority is delegation. Delegation is the downward transfer of authority from a manager to a subordinate. Most organizations today encourage managers to delegate authority in order to provide maximum flexibility in meeting customer needs. In addition, delegation leads to empowerment, in that people have the freedom to contribute ideas and do their jobs in the best possible ways. This involvement can increase job satisfaction for the individual and frequently results in better job performance. Without delegation, managers do all the work themselves and underutilize their workers. The ability to delegate is crucial to managerial success. Managers need to take four steps if they want to successfully delegate responsibilities to their teams. 1. Specifically assign tasks to individual team members. The manager needs to make sure that employees know that they are ultimately responsible for carrying out specific assignments. 2. Give team members the correct amount of authority to accomplish assignments. Typically, an employee is assigned authority commensurate with the task. A classical principle of organization warns managers not to delegate without giving the subordinate the authority to perform to delegated task. When an employee has responsibility for the task outcome but little authority, accomplishing the job is possible but difficult. The subordinate without authority must rely on persuasion and luck to meet performance expectations. When an employee has authority exceeding responsibility, he or she may become a tyrant, using authority toward frivolous outcomes. 3. Make sure that team members accept responsibility. Responsibility is the flip side of the authority coin. Responsibility is the duty to perform the task or activity an employee has been assigned. An important distinction between authority and responsibility is that the supervisor delegates authority, but the responsibility is shared. Delegation of authority gives a subordinate the right to make commitments, use resources, and take actions in relation to duties assigned. However, in making this delegation, the obligation created is not shifted from the supervisor to the subordinate — it is shared. A supervisor always retains some responsibility for work performed by lower‐level units or individuals. 4. Create accountability.
Despite the perceived disadvantages of delegation, the reality is that a manager can improve the performance of his or her work groups by empowering subordinates through effective delegation. Few managers are successful in the long term without learning to delegate effectively. So, how do managers learn to delegate effectively? The following additional principles may be helpful for managers who've tried to delegate in the past and failed:
Span of control Span of control (sometimes called span of management) refers to the number of workers who report to one manager. For hundreds of years, theorists have searched for an ideal span of control. When no perfect number of subordinates for a manager to supervise became apparent, they turned their attention to the more general issue of whether the span should be wide or narrow. A wide span of management exists when a manager has a large number of subordinates. Generally, the span of control may be wide when
A narrow span of management exists when the manager has only a few subordinates. The span should be narrow when
Keep in mind that the span of management may change from one department to another within the same organization. The general pattern of authority throughout an organization determines the extent to which that organization is centralized or decentralized. A centralized organization systematically works to concentrate authority at the upper levels. In a decentralized organization, management consciously attempts to spread authority to the lower organization levels. A variety of factors can influence the extent to which a firm is centralized or decentralized. The following is a list of possible determinants:
In principle, neither philosophy is right or wrong. What works for one organization may or may not work for another. Kmart Corporation and McDonald's have both been very successful — both practice centralization. By the same token, decentralization has worked very well for General Electric and Sears. Every organization must assess its own situation and then choose the level of centralization or decentralization that works best. What is the chain of command also known as?The chain of command, sometimes called the scaler chain, is the formal line of authority, communication, and responsibility within an organization. The chain of command is usually depicted on an organizational chart, which identifies the superior and subordinate relationships in the organizational structure.
What is bureaucratic organization?A bureaucratic organization is a government agency or commercial business with a heavily enforced chain of command and tightly regulated operating procedures. It's an administrative system that relies on policies, rules and hierarchy in both public and private sector environments.
What is hierarchy authority quizlet?The levels of management within a business organization, from the lowest to the highest. Departmentalization.
Which of the following refers to the management thinking and practice that stresses the satisfaction of employees basic needs as the key to increased worker productivity?Which of these refers to the management thinking and practice that emphasizes satisfaction of employees' basic needs as the key to increased worker productivity? human relations.
|