Do we act differently in big groups compared to small ones? Why and how do large organizations become inefficient? What are the various styles of leadership and what effect do they have? Show
These are just a few of the questions regarding social groups and organizations that sociology is interested in.
Why Study Social Groups and Social Organizations?Social groups are crucial to the transmission of culture in society. Due to this, studying them has become an essential component of sociological research. When we interact with others in our groups, we impart our ways of thinking and acting - from language and values to styles, preferences, and recreational pursuits. Groups can also comprise formal social organizations, which have specific and varied impacts on society and culture. Let's now dive into the study of social groups and organizations, focusing on social groups before moving onto organizations. Definition of Social GroupsFirst things first, let's clarify what we mean by 'groups'. In sociology, agroup refers to "any number of people with similar norms, values, and expectations who interact with one another on a regular basis."1 The crucial aspect is that members of a group must share some feeling of unity. This trait separates groups from aggregates, which aresimple collections of individuals, such as people who are on public transport at the same time. This also separates groups from categories - people who operate independently but have something in common, like being born in the same year.
Types of Social GroupsSociologists recognize several differences between various types of groups in society. Primary and Secondary GroupsThe term 'primary group' was first used by Charles Horton Cooley in 1902 to refer to a small group that is characterized by close-knit cooperation and association between members. Primary groups can be very impactful in a person's daily life. This is because they perform an expressive, i.e. emotional, function for us.Both the process of socialization and the formation of roles and statuses depend heavily on primary groups. A 'secondary group', on the other hand, is a formal, impersonal group with little social connection or understanding among its members. They serve an instrumental function, meaning that they tend to be goal-oriented. Secondary groups tend to form in spaces where people have a shared understanding, but minimal personal interaction. However, the distinction between primary and secondary groups is not always clear, and sometimes a primary group can become a secondary group (and vice versa). In-groups and Out-groupsSometimes, a group's connections to other groups might give it additional significance for its members. This is what forms the basis of in-groups and out-groups.
In-groups are often marked by a sense of importance and superiority from those who are not a part of the group, i.e. out-groups. Members of in-groups feel their behaviors, values, attitudes, etc. are not only better than but also unsuitable for the out-group. Reference GroupsA 'reference group' is any group people view as a benchmark for assessing themselves and their behavior. By establishing and enforcing morals, norms, and codes of conduct, reference groups serve a normative purpose. Reference groups also serve as a baseline by which individuals can judge each another, serving as a tool for comparison. Examples of Social GroupsLet's now look at examples of all the different types of groups we explored above:
While belonging to a group can be neutral or even advantageous, it should be noted that the idea of in-groups and out-groups can also help to explain some undesirable aspects of human behavior, such as bigotry against other groups due to their ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, etc. Characteristics of Social Groups: Group Size and StructureCharacteristics of social groups include group size and structure. Group size and structure are important because, even in tiny ranges, the composition of the group can radically change its dynamics. This is because when a group's size increases, so may the position of both its leaders and non-leader members. Group LeadershipFormal leaders are uncommon in primary groups, although informal leadership may exist. There are two different leadership functions in secondary groups: expressive leaders, who prioritize emotional well-being, and instrumental leaders, who prioritize results. A strict teacher or CEO of a company typically acts as an instrumental leader. On the other hand, the director of a youth program or a religious leader may be an expressive leader. Additionally, there are various leadership styles, including democratic, authoritarian, and laissez-faire. Dyads and TriadsA small group is usually defined as a collection of individuals who are close enough to one another to interact at the same time. Georg Simmel (1902) differentiated between two types of small groups: dyads and triads. The dyad, or two-member group, is the most basic of all social groups or partnerships. Adding one more person to a dyad drastically changes the dynamics of the small group. The dyad expands to a triad of three people.
Group ConformityThe degree to which someone complies is their level of conformity with expectations or group norms. As you may remember, reference groups are used to evaluate and understand how to act, think, behave, present oneself, etc. Numerous studies have demonstrated how powerful the desire to fit in with reference groups can be. Real-life experiments by Solomon Asch (1956) and Stanley Milgram (1962) show how conformity and obedience can push people to act in morally and ethically questionable ways. Asch's (1956) experiment showed that people in a group are much more likely to respond with an incorrect answer to a question (that they know is incorrect) if a significant number of others choose the wrong answer. He discovered that people easily give up what they know is right in order to conform. In his infamous Milgram Experiment, Milgram's (1962) research participants were shown to be overwhelmingly willing to carry out activities that directly contradicted their consciences if ordered to do so. In the experiment, participants were willing to shock those who gave incorrect answers with harsh or even fatal electric shocks. Formal OrganizationsAformal organizationis a group created for a specific goal and systematized for the highest efficiency. According to sociologist Amitai Etzioni (1975), formal organizations can be divided into three types:
Bureaucracy as a Formal OrganizationA bureaucracy is a formal organization distinguished by impersonality, a hierarchy of power, clear rules, and a distinct division of labor. Bureaucracies are an ideal kind of formal organization. 'Ideal' in the sociological context refers to a broad model that represents a set of features, in this example those listed by Max Weber (1922). They are designed to increase efficiency, guarantee equal opportunity, and ensure that the majority of people can be served. A strict division of labor and rigid adherence to rules might, however, cause an organization to 'lag' behind the times. We have further, separate articles on all of the topics mentioned here. Check these out if you want more detail! Social Groups - Key takeaways
References
Q. What is an example of a social group? A. An example of a social group is one's friend group, which is a type of primary group. Q. What are the types of social groups? A. Types of social groups include primary and secondary groups, in-groups and out-groups, and reference groups. Q. What are social groups? A. In sociology, agroup refers to "any number of people with similar norms, values, and expectations who interact with one another on a regular basis." (Schaefer, 2010). Q. What is the difference between social groups and social organizations? A. A social group refers to a group of people with shared characteristics who interact regularly. A formal social organization, on the other hand, is a group created for a specific goal and systematized for the highest efficiency. Q. What are the characteristics of social groups? A. Different social groups have different characteristics, but a crucial aspect of all of them is that members of a group must share some feeling of unity. Frequently Asked Questions about Social GroupsAn example of a social group is one's friend group, which is a type of primary group. Types of social groups include primary and secondary groups, in-groups and out-groups, and reference groups. In sociology, a group refers to "any number of people with similar norms, values, and expectations who interact with one another on a regular basis." (Schaefer, 2010). A social group refers to a group of people with shared characteristics who interact regularly. A formal social organization, on the other hand, is a group created for a specific goal and systematized for the highest efficiency. Different social groups have different characteristics, but a crucial aspect of all of them is that members of a group must share some feeling of unity. Final Social Groups Quiz
Question What are some questions regarding social groups and organizations that sociologists may consider? Show answer Answer Do we act differently in big groups compared to small ones? Why and how do large organizations become inefficient? What are the various styles of leadership and what effect do they have? Show question
Question Define social groups in sociology. Show answer Answer In sociology, a group refers to "any number of people with similar norms, values, and expectations who interact with one another on a regular basis." Show question
Question Fill in the blanks: The crucial aspect is that members of a group must share some feeling of _____. This trait separates groups from _____, which are simple collections of individuals, such as people who are on public transport at the same time. This also separates groups from _____ - people who operate independently but have something in common, like being born in the same year. Show answer Answer Unity, aggregates, categories. Show question
Question Who first coined the term 'primary group'? Show answer
Question Primary groups perform an expressive function, while secondary groups serve an instrumental function. True or false? Show answer
Question What do we mean by in-groups and out-groups? Show answer Answer Any group or category that people believe they belong to is considered an in-group. In other words, it includes everyone who is referred to as "we" or "us." The presence of an in-group necessitates the existence of an out-group, which is a group or category to which people believe they do not belong. Out-groups are perceived as "they" or "them." Show question
Question Finish the sentence: In-groups are often marked by a sense of importance and... Show answer Answer Superiority from those who are not a part of the group, i.e. out-groups. Show question
Answer A 'reference group' is any group people view as a benchmark for assessing themselves and their behavior. Show question
Question List some examples of in-groups and out-groups. Show answer Answer Examples of in-groups and out-groups include sports teams, unions, and sororities; individuals might be a part of any of these groups or consider themselves outsiders. Show question
Question What are some examples of primary and secondary groups? Show answer Answer
Show question
Question Formal leaders are common in primary groups, while informal leadership is less common. True or false? Show answer
Question What is the difference between dyads and triads? Show answer Answer The dyad, or two-member group, is the most basic of all social groups or partnerships. Adding one more person to a dyad drastically changes the dynamics of the small group. The dyad expands to a triad of three people. Show question
Question Provide some real-life examples of the issues with group conformity. Show answer Answer Asch's (1956) experiment showed that people in a group are much more likely to respond with an incorrect answer to a question (that they know is incorrect) if a significant number of others choose the wrong answer. He discovered that people easily give up what they know is right in order to conform. In his infamous Milgram Experiment, Milgram's (1962) research participants were shown to be overwhelmingly willing to carry out activities that directly contradicted their consciences if ordered to do so. In the experiment, participants were willing to shock those who gave incorrect answers with harsh or even fatal electric shocks. Show question
Question List the three types of formal organizations. Show answer Answer
Show question
Question Fill in the blanks: A bureaucracy is a formal organization distinguished by ____, a hierarchy of ____, clear ____, and a distinct division of ____. Show answer Answer Impersonality, power, rules, labor. Show question
Question What is the study of bureaucracies in sociology set in the context of? Show answer Answer The study of bureaucracies in sociology is set in the context of formal organizations and how they operate, as bureaucracies are a type of formal organization. Show question
Question Define a formal organization. Show answer Answer A formal organization is "an impersonal organization that is typically large and highly structured, formed to achieve explicit long-term objectives and designed to maximize efficiency." Show question
Question What are formal organizations designed to do? Show answer Answer They are designed to manage large-scale operations. Show question
Question How many categories of formal organizations are there? Name them. Show answer Answer According to sociologist Amitai Etzioni (1975), there are three categories of formal organizations. These are: 1. Normative or voluntary organizations 2. Coercive organizations 3. Utilitarian organizations Show question
Answer A bureaucracy is a type of formal organization which utilizes rule and hierarchy to achieve its goals efficiently. Show question
Question How many bureaucracies does the US government have? Show answer
Question What are formal bureaucracies? Show answer Answer Formal bureaucracies contain rules that are explicitly written, laid out and enforced by the organization. There is little room for flexibility as they follow a hierarchical structure and are rigidly followed. Show question
Question What are informal bureaucracies? Show answer Answer Informal bureaucracies don't have a formalized set of rules and instead operate through agreements between those who work together. These agreements may include unwritten, unofficial norms about decision-making and information sharing. Show question
Question Weber characterized a bureaucracy as having five main principles. What are these? Show answer Answer
Show question
Question The five principles form the 'best' or 'most preferred' type of bureaucracy. True or false? Show answer
Question Describe the principle of division of labor and task specialization. Show answer Answer A key principle of bureaucracies is that everyone has their own job to do, and they only do that job. The division of labor is clear, and tasks are specialized according to individuals' jobs. By doing this, people can do their job with the highest level of efficiency and become skilled at what they do. Show question
Question What is the role of impersonality in bureaucracies? Show answer Answer Impersonality in bureaucracies ensures that there are no personal feelings in professional situations and/or decision-making. This means that members of a bureaucracy carry out their jobs without giving personal attention or consideration to individuals. Show question
Question What does sine ira et studio mean? Show answer Answer "Without hatred or passion". Show question
Question List some benefits of bureaucracies. Show answer Answer
Show question
Question What is a criticism of impersonality? Show answer Answer Some argue that impersonality has led to large bureaucracies appearing as cold, mechanical and uncaring towards individuals, communities and other businesses. Show question
Question According to Michels (1911), how are all large organizations characterized? Show answer Answer The Iron Rule of Oligarchy. Show question
Question Name an alternative way of looking at bureaucratic dynamics. Show answer Answer One way is using the human relations approach. This approach looks at people, communication, and the workers' job satisfaction. Show question
Question What is a criticism of Max Weber's principles of bureaucracies? Show answer Answer Max Weber's principles themselves fail to account for complexities in organizations and informal/unofficial power structures. They also overemphasize the role of rationality. Show question
Question How can bureaucracies reflect social inequality? Show answer Answer Bureaucracies may reflect social inequality, as they were typically headed by wealthy, powerful White men who may only look for merit in other powerful White men. Show question
Question Name some other models of bureaucracies. Show answer Answer Other models of bureaucracies include the:
Show question Discover the right content for your subjectsNo need to cheat if you have everything you need to succeed! Packed into one app!Study PlanBe perfectly prepared on time with an individual plan. QuizzesTest your knowledge with gamified quizzes. FlashcardsCreate and find flashcards in record time. NotesCreate beautiful notes faster than ever before. Study SetsHave all your study materials in one place. DocumentsUpload unlimited documents and save them online. Study AnalyticsIdentify your study strength and weaknesses. Weekly GoalsSet individual study goals and earn points reaching them. Smart RemindersStop procrastinating with our study reminders. RewardsEarn points, unlock badges and level up while studying. Magic MarkerCreate flashcards in notes completely automatically. Smart FormattingCreate the most beautiful study materials using our templates. Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free. Are secondary groups that are formally organized to achieve specific goals?6.3.
A formal organization is a large secondary group deliberately organized to achieve its goals efficiently. Typically, formal organizations are highly bureaucratized. The term bureaucracy refers to what Max Weber termed “an ideal type” of formal organization (1922).
Are secondary groups formally organized?Secondary groups include impersonal, temporary relationships that are goal-oriented. Secondary groups often have an organized structure, an authority figure who oversees the rules, while primary groups are typically informally organized.
Which of the following is an example of a secondary group?A university class, an athletic team, and workers in an office all likely form secondary groups.
What best describes a secondary group?Secondary groups (social groups)
A secondary group is a relatively larger group composed of impersonal and goal-oriented relationships, which are often temporary. These groups are often based on achieving a common purpose outside of the relationship itself and involve much less emotional investment.
|