Strategic leadership may be seen as an extension of the transactional leadership role.

Abstract

Although the transformational-transactional leadership paradigm is successful in explaining considerable portions of variance in organizationally relevant outcome criteria, recent critiques emphasized that this paradigm might be incomplete. Thus, Antonakis and House (2002) suggested that instrumental leadership might extend the transformational-transactional leadership paradigm and allow for a more detailed and realistic description of the leadership phenomenon. The present study is the first to test — among basic aspects of construct validity — the prognostic validity of instrumental leadership with regard to performance and job satisfaction. Results from three independent empirical studies revealed that four dimensions of instrumental leadership (i.e., Environmental Monitoring, Strategy Formulation, Path-Goal Facilitation, and Outcome Monitoring) can be distinguished. As for concurrent validity, Environmental Monitoring and Path-Goal Facilitation were related to job satisfaction. This result was obtained while controlling for transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership, lending support for the incremental validity of instrumental leadership. With regard to the predictive validity, Environmental Monitoring, Strategy Formulation, and Path-Goal Facilitation (assessed at T1) were related to subsequent objective performance (assessed at T2) in a second study. Finally, in a third study, Path-Goal Facilitation (T1) was associated with subsequent job satisfaction and affective commitment (both T2). Overall, these results demonstrate that potentially, instrumental leadership is a valid extension to the transformational-transactional leadership paradigm.

Journal Information

Founded in 1987 by a group of prominent German professors, the journal is one of the oldest publications for personnel research worldwide, and is the only journal in its field outside of the United States and Great Britain listed in the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI).  Historically, the journal sought to offer a forum for personnel research scientists from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.  However, it has expanded internationally in more recent times by increasing its number of English articles. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung is a scientific journal that publishes qualitative and quantitative research as well as conceptual and theoretical essays that promise new insights on the current state of knowledge.

Publisher Information

Sara Miller McCune founded SAGE Publishing in 1965 to support the dissemination of usable knowledge and educate a global community. SAGE is a leading international provider of innovative, high-quality content publishing more than 900 journals and over 800 new books each year, spanning a wide range of subject areas. A growing selection of library products includes archives, data, case studies and video. SAGE remains majority owned by our founder and after her lifetime will become owned by a charitable trust that secures the company’s continued independence. Principal offices are located in Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC and Melbourne. www.sagepublishing.com

Rights & Usage

This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
Zeitschrift für Personalforschung / German Journal of Research in Human Resource Management
Request Permissions

Read Online (Free) relies on page scans, which are not currently available to screen readers. To access this article, please contact JSTOR User Support . We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free.

Get Started

Already have an account? Log in

Monthly Plan

  • Access everything in the JPASS collection
  • Read the full-text of every article
  • Download up to 10 article PDFs to save and keep
$19.50/month

Yearly Plan

  • Access everything in the JPASS collection
  • Read the full-text of every article
  • Download up to 120 article PDFs to save and keep
$199/year

Log in through your institution

Purchase a PDF

Purchase this article for $29.00 USD.

How does it work?

  1. Select the purchase option.
  2. Check out using a credit card or bank account with PayPal.
  3. Read your article online and download the PDF from your email or your account.

journal article

Strategic Leadership and Organizational Learning

The Academy of Management Review

Vol. 29, No. 2 (Apr., 2004)

, pp. 222-240 (19 pages)

Published By: Academy of Management

//doi.org/10.2307/20159030

//www.jstor.org/stable/20159030

Read and download

Log in through your school or library

Alternate access options

For independent researchers

Read Online

Read 100 articles/month free

Subscribe to JPASS

Unlimited reading + 10 downloads

Purchase article

$29.00 - Download now and later

Abstract

Adopting the strategic leadership perspective, we develop a theoretical model of the impact of CEO and top manager leadership styles and practices on organizational learning. We take a fine-grained look at the processes and levels of organizational learning to describe how strategic leaders influence each element of the learning system. Researchers have implicitly assumed transformational leadership approaches to organizational learning. We challenge this conventional wisdom by highlighting the value of transactional leadership as well.

Journal Information

The Academy of Management Review, now in its 26th year, is the most cited of management references. AMR ranks as one of the most influential business journals, publishing academically rigorous, conceptual papers that advance the science and practice of management. AMR is a theory development journal for management and organization scholars around the world. AMR publishes novel, insightful and carefully crafted conceptual articles that challenge conventional wisdom concerning all aspects of organizations and their role in society. The journal is open to a variety of perspectives, including those that seek to improve the effectiveness of, as well as those critical of, management and organizations. Each manuscript published in AMR must provide new theoretical insights that can advance our understanding of management and organizations. Most articles include a review of relevant literature as well. AMR is published four times a year with a circulation of 15,000.

Publisher Information

The Academy of Management (the Academy; AOM) is a leading professional association for scholars dedicated to creating and disseminating knowledge about management and organizations. The Academy's central mission is to enhance the profession of management by advancing the scholarship of management and enriching the professional development of its members. The Academy is also committed to shaping the future of management research and education. Founded in 1936, the Academy of Management is the oldest and largest scholarly management association in the world. Today, the Academy is the professional home for more than 18290 members from 103 nations. Membership in the Academy is open to all individuals who find value in belonging.

Rights & Usage

This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
The Academy of Management Review © 2004 Academy of Management
Request Permissions

What is the difference between strategic and transformational leadership?

Strategic leaders are very future-focused with an ability to maintain a specific vision while forecasting industry and market trends. Transformational leaders focus less on making decisions or establishing strategic plans, and more on facilitating organizational collaboration that can help drive a vision forward.

What kind of leadership style is better Is it transactional leadership or transformational leadership?

Neither approach is “better” than the other, and, despite the clear differences, the two are not mutually exclusive. A blended approach often works best because both leadership styles work, but they work best in in different situations, depending on the desired outcomes and on the leader.

What are the 4 components of transactional leadership?

Transactional leadership style.
Focused on short-term goals..
Favor structured policies and procedures..
Thrive on following rules and doing things correctly..
Revel in efficiency..
Very left-brained..
Tend to be inflexible..
Opposed to change..

Which leadership is build on top of transactional leadership?

Transformational leaders Transformational leadership is considered a selling management style. These leaders sell employees on their vision and motivate and inspire workers to challenge the status quo and work toward a larger goal. Transformational leaders have more personal connection with subordinates.

Toplist

Neuester Beitrag

Stichworte