Review
. 2019 Jan;11(1):136-153.
doi: 10.1111/tops.12389. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
Affiliations
- PMID: 30369059
- PMCID: PMC6360129
- DOI: 10.1111/tops.12389
Free PMC article
Review
Violations of Core Knowledge Shape Early Learning
Aimee E Stahl et al. Top Cogn Sci. 2019 Jan.
Free PMC article
Abstract
Research on cognitive development has revealed that even the youngest minds detect and respond to events that adults find surprising. These surprise responses suggest that infants have a basic set of "core" expectations about the world that are shared with adults and other species. However, little work has asked what purpose these surprise responses serve. Here we discuss recent evidence that violations of core knowledge offer special opportunities for learning. Infants and young children make predictions about the world on the basis of their core knowledge of objects, quantities, and social entities. We argue that when these predictions fail to match the observed data, infants and children experience an enhanced drive to seek and retain new information. This impact of surprise on learning is not equipotent. Instead, it is directed to entities that are relevant to the surprise itself; this drive propels children-even infants-to form and test new hypotheses about surprising aspects of the world. We briefly consider similarities and differences between these recent findings with infants and children, on the one hand, and findings on prediction errors in humans and non-human animals, on the other. These comparisons raise open questions that require continued inquiry, but suggest that considering phenomena across species, ages, kinds of surprise, and types of learning will ultimately help to clarify how surprise shapes thought.
Keywords: Children; Expectations; Infants; Learning; Object knowledge; Surprise.
Copyright © 2018 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.
Similar articles
Expectancy violations promote learning in young children.
Stahl AE, Feigenson L. Stahl AE, et al. Cognition. 2017 Jun;163:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Feb 27. Cognition. 2017. PMID: 28254617 Free PMC article.
How an infant's active response to structured experience supports perceptual-cognitive development.
Baek S, Jaffe-Dax S, Emberson LL. Baek S, et al. Prog Brain Res. 2020;254:167-186. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2020.05.015. Epub 2020 Jun 16. Prog Brain Res. 2020. PMID: 32859286 Review.
Cognitive development. Observing the unexpected enhances infants' learning and exploration.
Stahl AE, Feigenson L. Stahl AE, et al. Science. 2015 Apr 3;348(6230):91-4. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa3799. Science. 2015. PMID: 25838378 Free PMC article.
Prior probabilities modulate cortical surprise responses: A study of event-related potentials.
Seer C, Lange F, Boos M, Dengler R, Kopp B. Seer C, et al. Brain Cogn. 2016 Jul;106:78-89. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2016.04.011. Epub 2016 Jun 4. Brain Cogn. 2016. PMID: 27266394
Nonverbal generics: human infants interpret objects as symbols of object kinds.
Csibra G, Shamsudheen R. Csibra G, et al. Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:689-710. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015232. Epub 2014 Sep 12. Annu Rev Psychol. 2015. PMID: 25251493 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
Preverbal infants expect agents exhibiting counterintuitive capacities to gain access to contested resources.
Meng X, Nakawake Y, Hashiya K, Burdett E, Jong J, Whitehouse H. Meng X, et al. Sci Rep. 2021 May 25;11(1):10884. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89821-0. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34035341 Free PMC article.
Making Sense of the World: Infant Learning From a Predictive Processing Perspective.
Köster M, Kayhan E, Langeloh M, Hoehl S. Köster M, et al. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 May;15(3):562-571. doi: 10.1177/1745691619895071. Epub 2020 Mar 13. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020. PMID: 32167407 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
- Europe PubMed Central
- PubMed Central
- Wiley
Medical
- MedlinePlus Consumer Health Information
- MedlinePlus Health Information